The reorganisation of August 2019 and Article 370, the Line of Control, infiltration and cross-border terrorism, and the forces deployed in the Union Territory
Jammu and Kashmir is the most intensely guarded internal-security theatre in India, with the largest concentration of central forces, and the CRPF, the BSF and the J&K Police all operate there. A CAPF officer is very likely to serve in the Union Territory. The examination tests the constitutional change of 2019, the geography of the Line of Control, the mechanics of infiltration and cross-border terrorism, and the forces deployed. This note assembles them. The border itself is in indo pak border and relations; the legal counter-terror machinery is in terrorism and counter terrorism; the forces are in the five capfs in depth.
The static spine is anchored to the Constitution (Art 370, Art 35A), the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, and the MHA Annual Report. Infiltration and incident numbers are revised each year; treat them as the standard reference picture and verify the latest MHA Annual Report.
Article 370 of the Constitution gave the State of Jammu and Kashmir a special, temporary status, the product of the circumstances of accession in 1947. In practice it meant that, save for defence, external affairs and communications (the subjects of the Instrument of Accession) and a few others, the Union's laws applied to the State only with the concurrence of the State government, and the State had its own Constitution and flag. Article 35A (added by a 1954 Presidential Order) empowered the State to define its "permanent residents" and to reserve certain rights (land, employment, settlement) to them.
On 2019-08-05, the Government moved to change the status of Jammu and Kashmir.
| Step | What happened |
|---|---|
| Presidential Order (5 August 2019) | Superseded the 1954 order; effectively made all provisions of the Constitution applicable to Jammu and Kashmir, and rendered Art 370 inoperative |
| Parliamentary resolution | Recommended that Art 370 cease to be operative |
| Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 | Reorganised the State into two Union Territories: the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir (with a legislative assembly) and the Union Territory of Ladakh (without a legislative assembly), with effect from 2019-10-31 |
Article 35A fell with the change. The Supreme Court, in In re Article 370 (the constitution-bench judgment of December 2023), upheld the abrogation of the special status and the validity of the reorganisation, while directing that steps be taken towards the restoration of statehood and the holding of assembly elections. The result is that Jammu and Kashmir is now governed as a Union Territory under the general constitutional framework. Verify the latest position on statehood restoration.
The central security challenge in Jammu and Kashmir has been terrorism sponsored and supported from across the border, with armed groups infiltrating across the LoC and the international border to carry out attacks. The principal proscribed organisations associated with this include Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, both banned under the UAPA and listed by the UN.
| Force | Role in Jammu and Kashmir |
|---|---|
| Indian Army | Holds the LoC and the AGPL; counter-infiltration and counter-insurgency in the forward areas |
| BSF | Guards the international border (the working boundary) in the Jammu sector |
| CRPF | Internal security and law and order in the hinterland; the largest CAPF presence in the UT |
| J&K Police | The first responder; the State (now UT) police, with its own counter-insurgency record |
| Rashtriya Rifles | A specialised Army counter-insurgency formation |
Jammu and Kashmir has historically had the densest force concentration in India, reflecting both the external threat across the LoC and the internal-security challenge in the Valley.
Counter-terrorism in a populated theatre raises the same rights-and-security tension as elsewhere, sharpened by the political sensitivity of the region. A force operates under Art 21, the NHRC mechanism, and the principles of necessity, proportionality and minimum force, with attention to avoiding civilian casualties and the alienation of the population. The "hearts and minds" approach, combining security with development, governance and outreach, is the standing doctrine, on the logic that the population's confidence is the real centre of gravity. The interview board may probe how a young officer would balance firmness against restraint in such a theatre; the answer is the rule of law and minimum force, not a choice between security and rights. See afspa and the human rights debate and human rights and internal security.
| Often mixed up | The correct position |
|---|---|
| LoC vs international border | The LoC (Army) is a military line in J&K; the international border in Jammu (BSF) is the working boundary |
| Art 370 vs Art 35A | Art 370 gave the special status; Art 35A (1954) let the State define permanent residents |
| Two UTs in 2019 | Jammu and Kashmir (with an assembly) and Ladakh (without one) |
| LoC origin | The Cease-Fire Line of 1949, redesignated by the Simla Agreement of 1972 |
| Who holds the LoC | The Army, not the BSF |