The post 26/11 architecture, the three-tier coastal security grid, the Indian Coast Guard, the Sagar Prahari Bal and the marine police, and the maritime zones
The 26 November 2008 Mumbai attacks, carried out by terrorists who came in by sea, exposed a gap in India's coastal defences and forced a complete redesign of coastal and maritime security. The examination tests the post 26/11 architecture, the three-tier grid, the Indian Coast Guard, the Sagar Prahari Bal and the maritime zones. While the CAPFs are land forces, the maritime domain completes the picture of India's frontier security and is a standing exam topic, and CISF guards major ports. This note assembles it. The land-border picture is in border management of india; the wider architecture is in internal security architecture of india.
The static spine is anchored to the Coast Guard Act, 1978, the Maritime Zones Act framework, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and the MHA and Ministry of Defence frameworks. Specific asset numbers change; verify the latest position.
On 2008-11-26, ten terrorists of Lashkar-e-Taiba sailed from Karachi, hijacked an Indian fishing trawler, and landed by inflatable boats on the Mumbai shore, then carried out coordinated attacks across the city over nearly three days. The attack demonstrated that India's long coastline was a soft underbelly: there was no integrated coastal-surveillance system, the responsibilities of the Navy, the Coast Guard and the State police were not clearly meshed, and fishing craft and the coastal population were not part of the security net. The response was a comprehensive overhaul of coastal security.
The redesigned architecture is a three-tier grid, with each tier responsible for a defined zone, working under an integrated command.
| Tier | Force | Zone of responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Outermost / first tier | Indian Navy | The high seas and the outer maritime zone; the Navy has overall responsibility for maritime security, including coastal and offshore security |
| Middle tier | Indian Coast Guard (ICG) | The territorial waters and the contiguous and exclusive economic zones; patrolling close to the coast |
| Innermost tier | State marine / coastal police | The shallow coastal waters and the shoreline, with coastal police stations |
The Navy was designated the authority responsible for overall maritime security, including coastal and offshore security, with the Coast Guard responsible for coastal security in territorial waters. The three tiers are meshed so that a vessel is tracked from the deep sea to the shore.
| Item | Fact |
|---|---|
| Raised | 1978 (formally constituted under the Coast Guard Act, 1978) |
| Ministry | The Ministry of Defence (not the MHA) |
| Mandate | Protection of the maritime zones, the safety of life and property at sea, the protection of the marine environment, anti-smuggling, anti-poaching, and coastal security in territorial waters |
| Motto | Vayam Rakshamah (We Protect) |
The Coast Guard is the central force in the middle tier and the workhorse of coastal patrolling. Note that it is under the Ministry of Defence, not the MHA, which distinguishes it from the CAPFs.
A clean static fact-set the examination likes. Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and India's Maritime Zones Act framework, measured from the baseline:
| Zone | Extent from the baseline | India's rights |
|---|---|---|
| Territorial Sea | 12 nautical miles | Full sovereignty (subject to innocent passage) |
| Contiguous Zone | 24 nautical miles | Enforcement of customs, immigration, sanitary and fiscal laws |
| Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) | 200 nautical miles | Sovereign rights over the living and non-living resources |
| Continental Shelf | up to 200 (extendable to 350) nautical miles | Rights over the seabed resources |
The territorial sea (12 nm), the contiguous zone (24 nm) and the EEZ (200 nm) are the most examinable figures. The coastal security grid maps onto these zones.
Coastal security must balance the security net against the livelihoods of the fishing community, whose cooperation is essential to maritime-domain awareness (fishermen are the "eyes and ears" of the coast). The registration, colour-coding and biometric measures must not criminalise the fishing community or impede their livelihood; their consent and cooperation are part of the security design. The duty to protect life at sea (a core Coast Guard mandate) is itself a humanitarian function. This is the constructive, protective face of the security forces.
| Often mixed up | The correct position |
|---|---|
| Coast Guard's ministry | The Ministry of Defence, not the MHA |
| Who has overall maritime-security responsibility | The Indian Navy |
| Sagar Prahari Bal vs SAGAR | The SPB is a Navy force protecting bases; SAGAR is the IOR cooperation vision (2015) |
| Territorial sea vs EEZ | Territorial sea 12 nm (sovereignty); EEZ 200 nm (resource rights) |
| Innermost tier | The State marine / coastal police, not the Coast Guard |